Current:Home > NewsThis Is the single worst reason to claim Social Security early -MarketStream
This Is the single worst reason to claim Social Security early
View
Date:2025-04-19 15:07:13
Don't claim Social Security early for the wrong reasons
Many Americans fear for the future of Social Security, and this could be leading them to make some bad choices.
In fact, one recent study showed 44% of people think Social Security is going to run out of money before their retirement. This is one reason more than four in 10 people indicate they plan to claim Social Security between the ages of 62 and 65. By contrast, just 10% plan to wait until 70.
While it may seem smart to collect benefits ASAP in such a scenario, this is actually the worst possible reason to claim Social Security early. Here's why.
Making decisions related to Social Security because of a fear you won't get any benefits at all is a short-sighted choice that could cost you thousands of dollars. There are a few reasons for that.
Despite popular belief, Social Security is not in danger of running out of money. It has a steady revenue stream that comes from current workers' payroll taxes. This is not going to stop happening unless everyone in the U.S. stops working or unless the funding mechanism is changed -- which is extremely unlikely to occur.
It is true, however, that Social Security's trust fund is in danger of depletion by 2033. But if that happens, there would still be enough money coming from tax revenue to pay about 77% of the benefits promised. That's a hit, but it doesn't mean you won't get any of your retirement funds
Can I collect Social Security yet?It depends on when you were born.
Claiming Social Security early guarantees a smaller monthly check
The reality is, an early Social Security claim is going to mean you definitely get a smaller monthly benefit.
That's because you will get hit with early filing penalties if you claim before FRA. These could shrink your monthly checks by as much as 30% depending on how far ahead of schedule you start payments. And if you wait until FRA but not until age 70, you'll pass up delayed retirement credits that increase your monthly benefit up to 8% for each full year that you delay payments.
You do give up income by waiting to get benefits, but the majority of retirees are better off waiting until 70 because the larger monthly checks from claiming at that age add up to higher lifetime income from Social Security.
So, unless there are clear reasons why you want your benefits early -- such as concerns about your health or a desire to retire early that hinges on Social Security -- you should think very carefully before you make that choice. And definitely don't claim benefits prematurely out of fear of a future without them as that's unlikely to happen.
The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.
Offer from the Motley Fool:The $22,924 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook
If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. For example: one easy trick could pay you as much as $22,924 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Simply click here to discover how to learn more about these strategies.
View the "Social Security secrets"
veryGood! (6427)
Related
- Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
- Targeted as a Coal Ash Dumping Ground, This Georgia Town Fought Back
- Czech Esports Star Karel “Twisten” Asenbrener Dead at 19
- How Much Damage are Trump’s Solar Tariffs Doing to the U.S. Industry?
- Hackers hit Rhode Island benefits system in major cyberattack. Personal data could be released soon
- What’s Behind Big Oil’s Promises of Emissions Cuts? Lots of Wiggle Room.
- When Autumn Leaves Begin to Fall: As the Climate Warms, Leaves on Some Trees are Dying Earlier
- Kim Kardashian Addresses Rumors She and Pete Davidson Rekindled Their Romance Last Year
- Rylee Arnold Shares a Long
- If Aridification Choked the Southwest for Thousands of Years, What Does The Future Hold?
Ranking
- Trump's 'stop
- With an All-Hands-on-Deck International Summit, Biden Signals the US is Ready to Lead the World on Climate
- Ariana Madix Finally Confronts Diabolical, Demented Raquel Leviss Over Tom Sandoval Affair
- Joey Chestnut remains hot dog eating champ. Here's how many calories he consumed during the event.
- Charges tied to China weigh on GM in Q4, but profit and revenue top expectations
- What's closed and what's open on the Fourth of July?
- Trump EPA Targets More Coal Ash Rules for Rollback. Water Pollution Rules, Too.
- Clouds of Concern Linger as Wildfires Drag into Flu Season and Covid-19 Numbers Swell
Recommendation
Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
‘This Is Not Normal.’ New Air Monitoring Reveals Hazards in This Maine City.
Biden’s Paris Goal: Pressure Builds for a 50 Percent Greenhouse Gas Cut by 2030
Transcript: Former Attorney General Eric Holder on Face the Nation, July 2, 2023
Could Bill Belichick, Robert Kraft reunite? Maybe in Pro Football Hall of Fame's 2026 class
What's Next for Johnny Depp: Inside His Busy Return to the Spotlight
How Gender-Free Clothes & Accessories From Stuzo Clothing Will Redefine Your Closet
Massachusetts Sues Exxon Over Climate Change, Accusing the Oil Giant of Fraud